<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pfSense Firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motersho.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/21/pfsense-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motersho.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/21/pfsense-firewall/</link>
	<description>cat /dev/brain &#62; /var/blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helmikuu</title>
		<link>http://motersho.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/21/pfsense-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Helmikuu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motersho.com/blog/?p=662#comment-290</guid>
		<description>You made a nice choice mate. I thing good about pfsense is its ability to block https websites. Its system requirement is only a machine with at least a 200 MHz processor , 2 NICs and 128 MB RAM, which is better than the other firewall program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made a nice choice mate. I thing good about pfsense is its ability to block https websites. Its system requirement is only a machine with at least a 200 MHz processor , 2 NICs and 128 MB RAM, which is better than the other firewall program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

